It consists of three quatrains and a couplet at the end. The poem was first published in Collected Poems, in an remains one of Edna St. This poem is a contemplation by the speaker on all the ways in which humans suffer for love.
April 25, 20— The Ambiguity of Love: The speaker in the poem writes to her lover, it appears, after a night of passion and contemplates the ultimate power of love. Using the sonnet form, the traditional form for love poetry, the speaker points out that because there is no other emotion quite like the many-faceted emotion of love, it is utterly irreplaceable.
However, the poem also claims that love cannot feed the hungry, provide shelter from the elements, or heal physical pain, for these basic needs must be met to maintain a happy human existence.
Thus the poem is based on a tension or ambiguity about love: The poem can be broken into three parts or movements: In the first movement, Millay personifies love and uses familiar images such as food and shelter to show the reader what love is incapable of doing; thus, she yokes the commonplace and abstract together.
Breathing is perhaps the single most important necessity for human existence; take away oxygen and we all die. Obviously, love lacks the material necessities essential to survival. Our physical needs and desires cannot be quenched by love alone.
The narrator also points out that love is unable to protect or save us from physical dangers. It seems as though the hands of love are tied, preventing it from aiding us in any physical need.
Throughout the first movement of the sonnet, Millay juxtaposes love with the concrete physical necessities needed for survival; love simply cannot save us from the physical dangers of the world.
The central paradox of the poem is defined: Why is love so essential for survival when it is not a physical necessity? On the other hand, if the speaker presents this statement more as a question, then the speaker is indicating that she is wary of the power of love.
Even the trademark rhyming couplet that should bring closure to the poem is absent, for food and would are only near rhymes, thus reinforcing the tension between blind faith in love and the reality of its limited physical power.
The poem ends with uncertainty: However, the poem appears to use understatement to resolve this ambiguity. Works Cited Klemans, Patricia A. A New Look at Edna St. It Is Not Meat nor Drink. Harper and Row, Critical Essays on Edna St.Dec 27, · One thought on “ Love is not all, Edna St.
Vincent Millay – an analysis ” Pingback: Love is not all, Edna St.
Vincent Millay – an analysis | Tree Of Poe Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Edna St. Vincent Millay wrote modernist poetry by combining traditional forms with new ideas. In this lesson, we'll take a look at two of Millay's poems and analyze them for form and ideas.
Oct 22, · I am just stuck. Please help if you can. The lines have 10 syllables (lines ) then goes to 11 (lines ) then back to 10 from the next 2 lines then 11 then last line 10 I am so leslutinsduphoenix.com: Resolved.
These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of Edna St. Vincent Millay: Poems by Edna St. Vincent Millay.
"Love Is Not All" Commentary and Analysis A Wholesome Glimpse into Memories of Past Lovers: "Once More into My Arid Days Like Dew" and "I Think I Should Have Loved You Presently".
Poet and playwright Edna St. Vincent Millay was born in Rockland, Maine, on February 22, Her mother, Cora, raised her three daughters on her own after asking her husband to leave the family home in Edna St. Vincent Millay Love Is Not All -a younger female -does not believe love is all-powerful Who is the speaker?
talking to some form of lover "I might be driven to sell your love" -her and her lover are not going through a difficult time right now Situation -not completely cynical.